downloads | documentation | faq | getting help | mailing lists | licenses | wiki | reporting bugs | php.net sites | links | conferences | my php.net

search for in the

is_bool> <intval
Last updated: Fri, 20 May 2011

view this page in

is_array

(PHP 4, PHP 5)

is_arrayComprueba si una variable es una matriz

Descripción

bool is_array ( mixed $var )

Comprueba si la variable dada es una matriz.

Parámetros

var

La variable a ser evaluada.

Valores devueltos

Devuelve TRUE si var es un array, FALSE de lo contrario.

Ejemplos

Example #1 Comprobar que la variable es una matriz

<?php
$si 
= array('esto''es''una matriz');

echo 
is_array($si) ? 'Array' 'no es una Matriz';
echo 
"\n";

$no 'esto es una cadena';

echo 
is_array($no) ? 'Array' 'no es una Matriz';
?>

El resultado del ejemplo sería:

Array
not an Array

Ver también

  • is_float() - Comprueba si el tipo de una variable es flotante
  • is_int() - Comprueba si el tipo de una variable es un número entero
  • is_string() - Comprueba si una variable es de tipo cadena
  • is_object() - Comprueba si una variable es un objeto



is_bool> <intval
Last updated: Fri, 20 May 2011
 
add a note add a note User Contributed Notes is_array
magentix at gmail dot com 26-Feb-2011 05:12
If you wanted to have 'pure' associative arrays,
you could filter out non-string keys and then compare the count of the original array with the count of the filtered array.

<?php
   
// Only validates empty or completely associative arrays
   
function is_assoc ($arr) {
        return (
is_array($arr) && count(array_filter(array_keys($arr),'is_string')) == count($arr));
    }

   
$a = '';
   
$b = 'z';
   
$c = array();
   
$d = array('x','y','z');
   
$e = array('x','y','zed'=>'z');
   
$f = array('ex'=>'x','why'=>'y','zed'=>'z');

    echo
'$a: ' . ( (is_assoc($a)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$b: ' . ( (is_assoc($b)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$c: ' . ( (is_assoc($c)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // True
   
echo '$d: ' . ( (is_assoc($d)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$e: ' . ( (is_assoc($e)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // False
   
echo '$f: ' . ( (is_assoc($f)) ? 'true' : 'false' ) ."\n"; // True
?>   

I've tested the point of checking whether the array is empty first.
The overall result was a 200% speed increase when the array was indeed empty,
but an average 10% slow when it had elements inside.

<?php
   
/***********************************************************
     *    Benchmarks: checking for empty array vs. not checking  *
     ***********************************************************/
   
    // With empty check
   
function is_assoc ($arr) {
        return (
is_array($arr) && (!count($arr) || count(array_filter(array_keys($arr),'is_string')) == count($arr)));
    }
   
    function
test_speed($arr) {   
       
$t = microtime(true);
        for(
$i = 0; $i < 100000; ++$i) is_assoc($arr);
        return (
microtime(true) - $t);
    }
   
    echo
'$a: ' . test_speed($a) ."\n"; // 0.20597505569458
   
echo '$b: ' . test_speed($b) ."\n"; // 0.19199514389038
   
echo '$c: ' . test_speed($c) ."\n"; // 0.28803396224976
   
echo '$d: ' . test_speed($d) ."\n"; // 0.94685983657837
   
echo '$e: ' . test_speed($e) ."\n"; // 0.96698403358459
   
echo '$f: ' . test_speed($f) ."\n"; // 0.98052096366882
   
    // Without empty check
   
function is_assoc_2 ($arr) {
        return (
is_array($arr) && count(array_filter(array_keys($arr),'is_string')) == count($arr));
    }
   
    function
test_speed_2($arr) {   
       
$t = microtime(true);
        for(
$i = 0; $i < 100000; ++$i) is_assoc_2($arr);
        return (
microtime(true) - $t);
    }
   
    echo
'$a: ' . test_speed_2($a) ."\n"; // 0.18811202049255 = FASTER:  91.3% of is_assoc
   
echo '$b: ' . test_speed_2($b) ."\n"; // 0.18782901763916 = FASTER:  97.8% of is_assoc
   
echo '$c: ' . test_speed_2($c) ."\n"; // 0.64437484741211 = SLOWER: 223.7% of is_assoc
   
echo '$d: ' . test_speed_2($d) ."\n"; // 0.84632205963135 = FASTER:  89.4% of is_assoc
   
echo '$e: ' . test_speed_2($e) ."\n"; // 0.86739897727966 = FASTER:  89.7% of is_assoc
   
echo '$f: ' . test_speed_2($f) ."\n"; // 0.87963700294495 = FASTER:  89.7% of is_assoc
?>
cws1989 at gmail dot com 17-Aug-2010 07:14
Note that in the following case, other than returning false, it will also produce an E_NOTICE

<?php
error_reporting
(E_ALL | E_STRICT);

$emptyArray = array();
if (
is_array($emptyArray[0]) === false) {
    echo
'false returned';
}
?>

Output:
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in test.php on line 5
false returned
JTS 08-Jun-2010 11:22
I would change the order of the comparison, because if it is really an empty array, it is better to stop at that point before doing several 'cpu & memory intensive' function calls.

In the end on a ratio of 3 not empty arrays to 1 empty array computed for 1000000 iterations it needed 10% less time.
Or the other way round:
It needed approx 3% to 4% more time if the array is not empty, but was at least 4 times faster on empty arrays.

Additionally the memory consumption veritably lesser.

<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
    return (
is_array($array) && (count($array)==0 || 0 !== count(array_diff_key($array, array_keys(array_keys($array))) )));
}
?>
hperrin at gmail dot com 28-May-2010 05:02
I've found a faster way of determining an array. If you use is_array() millions of times, you will notice a *huge* difference. On my machine, this method takes about 1/4 the time of using is_array().

Cast the value to an array, then check (using ===) if it is identical to the original.

<?php
if ( (array) $unknown !== $unknown ) {
    echo
'$unknown is not an array';
} else {
    echo
'$unknown is an array';
}
?>

You can use this script to test the speed of both methods.

<pre>
What's faster for determining arrays?

<?php

$count
= 1000000;

$test = array('im', 'an', 'array');
$test2 = 'im not an array';
$test3 = (object) array('im' => 'not', 'going' => 'to be', 'an' => 'array');
$test4 = 42;
// Set this now so the first for loop doesn't do the extra work.
$i = $start_time = $end_time = 0;

$start_time = microtime(true);
for (
$i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
    if (!
is_array($test) || is_array($test2) || is_array($test3) || is_array($test4)) {
        echo
'error';
        break;
    }
}
$end_time = microtime(true);
echo
'is_array  :  '.($end_time - $start_time)."\n";

$start_time = microtime(true);
for (
$i = 0; $i < $count; $i++) {
    if (!(array)
$test === $test || (array) $test2 === $test2 || (array) $test3 === $test3 || (array) $test4 === $test4) {
        echo
'error';
        break;
    }
}
$end_time = microtime(true);
echo
'cast, === :  '.($end_time - $start_time)."\n";

echo
"\nTested $count iterations."

?>
</pre>

Prints something like:

What's faster for determining arrays?

is_array  :  7.9920151233673
cast, === :  1.8978719711304

Tested 1000000 iterations.
Anonymous 12-Mar-2010 07:00
<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
    return (
is_array($array) && (0 !== count(array_diff_key($array, array_keys(array_keys($array)))) || count($array)==0));
}
?>
because empty array is assoc. too
Anonymous 19-Oct-2009 10:10
If you would like to be able to check multiple variables at the same time, similar to isset, use the following:

<?php

function isarray() {
   
$A = func_get_args();
    foreach (
$A as $k => $v) {
        if (!
is_array($v)) {
            return
false;   
        }   
    }
    return
true;
}

?>
Anonymous 16-May-2009 09:18
Using empty() in the previous example posted by Anonymous will result in a "Fatal error: Can't use function return value in write context".  I suggest using count() instead:

<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
    return (
is_array($array) && 0 !== count(array_diff_key($array, array_keys(array_keys($array)))));
}
?>
Anonymous 06-May-2009 11:34
strictly speaking: array_diff_key does not return boolean, so using it in a comparison might eventually be considered 'bad'.
perhaps add a bit more cruft...?

<?php
function is_assoc($var)
{
        return
is_array($var) AND ! empty ( array_diff_key($var,array_keys(array_keys($var))));
}
?>
skaimauve at yahoo dot ca 03-Mar-2009 08:12
Or you could make use of the array_diff_key and array_key function:

<?php

function is_assoc($var)
{
        return
is_array($var) && array_diff_key($var,array_keys(array_keys($var)));
}

function
test($var)
{
        echo
is_assoc($var) ? "I'm an assoc array.\n" : "I'm not an assoc array.\n";
}

// an assoc array
$a = array("a"=>"aaa","b"=>1,"c"=>true);
test($a);

// an array
$b = array_values($a);
test($b);

// an object
$c = (object)$a;
test($c);

// other types
test($a->a);
test($a->b);
test($a->c);

?>

The above code outputs:
I'm an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
I'm not an assoc array.
Matthias Loitsch 03-Dec-2008 07:36
Or you could make use of the array_diff_key and range functions:

<?php

function isVector($var) { return count(array_diff_key($var, range(0, count($var) - 1))) == 0; }

function
isAssociative($var) { return !isVector($var); }

?>
jim at akubo dot net 28-Oct-2008 07:02
yousef's example was wrong because is_vector returned true instead of false if the key was found
here is the fixed version (only 2 lines differ)
<?php
function is_vector( &$array ) {
   if ( !
is_array($array) || empty($array) ) {
      return -
1;
   }
  
$next = 0;
   foreach (
$array as $k => $v ) {
      if (
$k !== $next ) return false;
     
$next++;
   }
   return
true;
}
?>
yousuf at philipz dot com 16-Oct-2008 10:41
alex frase's example is fast but elanthis at awesomeplay dot com's example is faster and Ilgar's modification of alex's code is faulty (the part " || $_array[$k] !== $v"). Also, Ilgar's suggestion of giving a false return value when the variable isnt an array is not suitable in my opinion and i think checking if the array is empty would also be a suitable check before the rest of the code runs.

So here's the modified (is_vector) version

<?php
function is_vector( &$array ) {
   if ( !
is_array($array) || empty($array) ) {
      return -
1;
   }
  
$next = 0;
   foreach (
$array as $k => $v ) {
      if (
$k !== $next ) return true;
     
$next++;
   }
   return
false;
}
?>

and the modified (alex's is_assoc) version

<?php
function is_assoc($_array) {
    if ( !
is_array($_array) || empty($array) ) {
        return -
1;
    }
    foreach (
array_keys($_array) as $k => $v) {
        if (
$k !== $v) {
            return
true;
        }
    }
    return
false;
}
?>
alex frase 16-Jul-2008 03:05
Yet another simpler, faster is_assoc():

<?php
function is_assoc($array) {
  foreach (
array_keys($array) as $k => $v) {
    if (
$k !== $v)
      return
true;
  }
  return
false;
}
?>

In my tests it runs about twice as fast as Michael/Gabriel's array_reduce() method.

(Speaking of which: Gabriel's version doesn't work as written; it reports associative arrays as numeric if only the first key is non-numeric, or if the keys are numeric but ordered backwards.  Michael solves this problem by comparing array_reduce() to count(), but that costs another function call; it also works to just compare to -1 instead of 0, and therefore return -1 as the ternary else from the callback).
Amaroq 09-Mar-2008 06:36
Even if an array has only one value, it is still an array and is treated like one.

<?php
$arr
[] = "I'm an array.";

if(
is_array($arr))
{
    foreach(
$arr as $val)
    {
        echo
$val;
    }
}
?>

The above code outputs:
I'm an array.
DJ ProG (Poland, Lodz) 19-Dec-2007 09:14
Hi.
My boolean function returns true, if all values in array are that same type (like in my funct. - it checks, if all are numeric).

<?php

 
function isNumArray($array)
 {
 
$r = false;
  if (
is_array($array))
  {
   foreach(
$array as $n=>$v)
   {
    if (
is_array( $array[$n] ))
    {
    
$r = isNumArray( $array[$n] );
     if (
$r==false) break;
    } else
     if (!
is_numeric($v))
     {
     
$r=false;
      break;
     } else
     
$r=true;
   }
  }
  return
$r;
 }

 
# example
 
$arr1 = array('34', 3.14, array('321', 092), '2', 55, -173, array('1.98', '-044'), '0');
 
$arr2 = array('3 4', 3.14, array('-321', 56, 0-92), '2', 55, true, array('zero44'), '0');

  echo
'1. '.(isNumArray($arr1) ? 'Only numz.' : 'Various values!')."\r\n".
      
'2. '.(isNumArray($arr2) ? 'Only numz.' : 'Various values!');

 
# return
  #  1. Only numz.
  #  2. Various values!

?>
Michael 11-Sep-2007 07:37
A slight modification of what's below:

<?php

function is_assoc($array)
{
    return
is_array($array) && count($array) !== array_reduce(array_keys($array), 'is_assoc_callback', 0);
}

function
is_assoc_callback($a, $b)
{
    return
$a === $b ? $a + 1 : 0;
}

?>
gabriel at bumpt dot nothing-here dot net 29-Aug-2007 03:34
Yet another safer, faster way of detecting whether an array is associative.

The principle is: using array reduction on the keys, we verify that each key is numeric and is equal to its rank.

Beware: integer keys that are not in sequence, or are negative, or with "holes", still make an associative array.

<?php
/**
  * @param array $arr
  * @returns boolean
  */
function isNotAssocArray($arr)
{
    return (
0 !== array_reduce(
       
array_keys($arr),
       
create_function('$a, $b', 'return ($b === $a ? $a + 1 : 0);'),
       
0
       
)
    );
}
?>

Of course, it is still faster if the callback for array_reduce is not an anonymous function:

<?php
function callbackReduceNotArray($a, $b)
{
    return (
$b === $a ? $a + 1 : 0);
}
function
isVector($arr)
{
    return (
0 !== array_reduce(
       
array_keys($arr),
       
'callbackReduceNotArray',
       
0
       
)
    );
}
?>
Rob 04-Jul-2007 08:04
Here's another way to see if an array is associative (nobody actually uses the term "vector" ;-) ). It's a little less breakable than the other current leading suggestion, and it's somewhat faster. Tested with 1000 iterations of two simple arrays (one associative, one not).

<?php

function array_is_associative ($array)
{
    if (
is_array($array) && ! empty($array) )
    {
        for (
$iterator = count($array) - 1; $iterator; $iterator-- )
        {
            if ( !
array_key_exists($iterator, $array) ) { return true; }
        }
        return !
array_key_exists(0, $array);
    }
    return
false;
}

?>
markus-rehrs at gmx dot de 28-Jun-2007 07:49
@elanthis at awesomeplay dot com, your function to check whether an array is a map or a vector has a little flaw.
Comparing $k != $value will return true if $value is  0. If you check a map containing just one element like array('foo'=>'bar') your check assumes that this is a vector. Use the operator !== (not identical with) to avoid that:

<?php
function is_vector (&$array) {
 
$next = 0;
  foreach (
$array as $k=>$v) {
    if (
$k !== $next)
      return
false;
   
$next++;
  }
  return
true;
}
?>
lukas.skowronski at gmail dot com 20-Jun-2007 11:10
If You want to del all slashes from database query result , try this function:

<?php
function no_slashes($array)
    {
        foreach(
$array as $key=>$value)
            {
                if(
is_array($value))
                    {
                       
$value=no_slashes($value);
                       
$array_temp[$key]=$value;                       
                    }
                else
                    {
                       
$array_temp[$key]=stripslashes($value);
                    }
            }       
        return
$array_temp;   
    }
?>
Alfred J Fazio <alfred dot fazio at gmail dot com> 04-Apr-2007 11:32
Yet another associative array test:

<?php
function binary_nand ($a, $b) { return !$a && !$b; }
function
binary_nor ($a, $b)  { return !$a || !$b; }

// Returns true if array has elements with non-numeric keys
function is_associative_array ($arr) {
  return
is_array($arr) && !empty($arr) && array_reduce(array_map("is_numeric", array_keys($arr)), "binary_nor", true);
}

// Returns true if all elements of array have a non-numeric key
function is_strict_associative_array ($arr) {
  return
is_array($arr) && !empty($arr) && array_reduce(array_map("is_numeric", array_keys($arr)), "binary_nand", false);
}
?>
angelo [at] mandato <dot> com 26-Feb-2007 09:32
The is_associative_array() and is_sequential_array() functions posted by 'rjg4013 at rit dot edu' are not accurate.

The functions fail to recognize indexes that are not in sequence or in order.  For example, array(0=>'a', 2=>'b', 1=>'c') and array(0=>'a', 3=>'b', 5=>'c') would be considered as sequential arrays. A true sequential array would be in consecutive order with no gaps in the indices.

The following solution utilizes the array_merge properties. If only one array is given and the array is numerically indexed, the keys get re-indexed in a continuous way.  The result must match the array passed to it in order to truly be a numerically indexed (sequential) array.  Otherwise it can be assumed to be an associative array (something unobtainable in languages such as C).

The following functions will work for PHP >= 4.

<?php
   
function is_sequential_array($var)
    {
        return (
array_merge($var) === $var && is_numeric( implode( array_keys( $var ) ) ) );
    }
   
    function
is_assoc_array($var)
    {
        return (
array_merge($var) !== $var || !is_numeric( implode( array_keys( $var ) ) ) );
    }
?>

If you are not concerned about the actual order of the indices, you can change the comparison to == and != respectively.
jupiter at nospam dot com 30-May-2006 06:42
Will check a Multi-Dimentional Array to any specified level.  This is a fix to 11/16/05 submission, which would break since you must supply a foreach with an array. Beware recursive functions shouldn't go over 100 deep or could break the memory stack on server.

<?php
// checks for multiarray to defined depth level recursively
// original $level must be 2 or more, else will instantly return true
function isDeepMultiArray($multiarray, $level = 2) {  // default is simple multiarray
   
if (is_array($multiarray)) {  // confirms array
       
if ($level == 1) {  // $level reaches 1 after specified # of recursions 
           
return true// returns true to recursive function conditional
       
// end conditional
       
foreach ($multiarray as $array) {  // goes one level deeper into array
           
if (isDeepMultiArray($array, $level - 1)) {  // check subarray
               
$message = "I'm a multiarray"// optional message
               
return $message// best if $message = true so function returns boolean
           
// end recursive function
       
// end loop
   
} else {  // not an array at specified level
   
return false// is also used recursively so can't change to message
   
}
}

if (
isDeepMultiArray(array(array()), 2)); // beware this returns true eventhough arrays are empty

?>
BTW my notation is consistent with the PEAR manual on coding standards, which is what php.net says to follow. I hope a function like this gets included in PHP6.
jupiter at nospam dot com 30-May-2006 04:15
Simple check for a Multi-Dimentional Array of any depth
<?php
// checks for multiarray (2 or more levels deep)
function isMultiArray($multiarray) {
  if (
is_array($multiarray)) {  // confirms array
   
foreach ($multiarray as $array) {  // goes one level deeper
     
if (is_array($array)) {  // is subarray an array
       
return true// return will stop function
     
// end 2nd check
   
// end loop
 
// end 1st check
 
return false// not a multiarray if this far
}
?>
jupiter at nospam dot com 30-May-2006 02:50
Will check a Multi-Dimentional Array to any specified level.  This is a fix to 11/16/05 submission, which would break since you must supply a foreach with an array. Beware recursive functions shouldn't go over 100 deep or could break the memory stack on server.
<?php
// checks for multiarray to defined depth level recursively
function isDeepMultiArray($multiarray, $level = 2) {  // default is simple multi-array
 
if (is_array($multiarray)) {  // confirms array
   
if ($level == 1) {   // is array only 1 level deep, hence not multiarray
     
return true;
    } 
// end conditional
   
foreach ($multiarray as $array) {  // goes one level deeper
     
if (isDeepMultiArray($array, $level - 1)) {  // check subarray
       
return true;
      } 
// end recursive function
   
// end loop
 
} else {  // not an array at specified level
   
return false;
  }
}
?>
BTW my notation is consistent with the PEAR manual on coding standards, which is what php.net says to follow. I hope a function like this gets included in PHP6.
March 30-Mar-2006 02:28
And here is another variation for a function to test if an array is associative. Based on the idea by mot4h.

<?php
function is_associative($array)
{
  if (!
is_array($array) || empty($array))
    return
false;

 
$keys = array_keys($array);
  return
array_keys($keys) !== $keys;
}
?>
mot4h at cs dot virginia dot edu 22-Feb-2006 09:41
I was looking at several of the other examples for testing if an array is associative and they seemed a little limited, or a little bulky. Here's my take on it, I think it's a nice balance:

<?php
function is_associative($array){
  if (!
is_array($array)) return false;
  foreach(
array_keys($array) as $key=>$value) {
    if (
$key != $value) return true;
  }
  return
false;
}
?>

The idea being that the array_keys() function returns a non-associative array, so if the array you fed it wasn't associative, all the key/value pairs in the array of keys should be identical. Otherwise it must have been associative.
junkpost at list dot ru 27-Jan-2006 12:06
There is another example of check to associative array. (See below early versions.)

<?php

funciton is_assoc_array
($var) {
    return
is_array($var) && !empty($var) && !preg_match('/^\d+$/', implode('', array_keys($var)));
}

?>
ryanyoder at canby dot com 17-Nov-2005 06:25
this is my attempt at writing a function that would check for a multi dimentional array.  where $dim is the number of dimentions you are checking for and $array is of course the variable that is being check.  i dont know if there's a better way out there, but this is what i do.

<?php
  
function is_multi_array($array,$dim)
   {
      if((
$dim==1)&&(is_array($array)))
      {
         return
1;
      }
      foreach(
$array as $level2)
      {
         if(
is_multi_array($level2,$dim-1))
         {
            return
1;
         }
      }
      return
0;
   }
?>
dan at cain dot sh 11-Dec-2004 01:05
is_array() under PHP 5.0.2 will return FALSE when passed an object descended from the internal class interface ArrayAccess(http://www.php.net/spl) even though said object behaves as an array would in most instances.

I've found the following user function helpful with my own classes and functions that expect array(s) as arguments, but work fine with objects that behave as an array would.

<?php
function is_array_abled(&$x)
{
    return (bool)(
$x instanceof ArrayAccess or is_array($x));
}
?>
vhermecz at ixpert dot hu 02-Apr-2004 12:58
Mike's function is quite cool, it is just the one, I was searching for. Using range is a great idea! But it's a bit long for me. Here is a shorter version:

<?php
function is_assoc_array($var) {
    if (!
is_array($var)) {
        return
false;
    }
    return
array_keys($var)!==range(0,sizeof($var)-1);
}
?>

Or, if you don't want to type that much:

<?php
function is_assoc($var) {
    return
is_array($var) && array_keys($var)!==range(0,sizeof($var)-1);
}
?>
mike-php at spam dot emerge2 dot spam dot com 22-Aug-2003 10:20
All arrays in PHP are associative arrays, but it is quite easy to treat an associative array just like it is a sequential array. However, when dealing with XML-RPC, it is necessary to know whether an array is associative or sequential, so I created this function.

It isn't perfect, since an associative array that just happens to have sequential, integer keys starting with 0 will 'look' exactly like a sequential array, and will fool this function.

<?php
/****************************************************************
* is_assoc_array tries to decide whether or not a given array   *
* is an associative array, or a sequential array. Of course, no *
* such distinction is made by PHP, so it really just tests      *
* whether or not a given array could possibly be a sequential   *
* array. Since an associative array with sequential, integer    *
* keys 'looks' just like a sequential array, this function will *
* be fooled.                                                    *
*                                                               *
* BUG: Associative arrays with sequential, integer keys 'look'  *
* just like sequential arrays, and will be identified as such.  *
*                                                               *
****************************************************************/
function is_assoc_array( $php_val ) {
   if( !
is_array( $php_val ) ){
     
# Neither an associative, nor non-associative array.
     
return false;
   }

  
$given_keys = array_keys( $php_val );
  
$non_assoc_keys = range( 0, count( $php_val ) );

   if(
function_exists( 'array_diff_assoc' ) ) { # PHP > 4.3.0
     
if( array_diff_assoc( $given_keys, $non_assoc_keys ) ){
         return
true;
      }
      else {
         return
false;
      }
   }
   else {
      if(
array_diff( $given_keys, $non_assoc_keys ) and array_diff( $non_assoc_keys, $given_keys ) ){
         return
true;
      }
      else {
         return
false;
      }
   }
}
?>

 
show source | credits | stats | sitemap | contact | advertising | mirror sites